Most of us do not accept that cancer and mobile phones usage is bad for health – but is that because studies showing a link to cancer have been cast into doubt by the industry.
This year a landmark United States government study concluded (scientific peer review) of that there is “clear evidence” that radiation from mobile phones causes cancer, they claimed more specifically that a heart tissue cancer (Cancer and mobile phones) in rats that is too rare to be explained as random occurrence.
3 days at Research Triangle Park, North Carolina spent by eleven volunteer scientists, discussing the study (Cancer and mobile phones), which was done by the National Toxicology Program of the US Department of Health and Human Services and ranks among the largest conducted of the health effects of mobile phone radiation. Those scientists showed that thousands of rats and mice having biological similarities to humans make them useful indicators of human health risks) to doses of radiation equivalent to an average mobile user’s lifetime exposure.
Peer review scientists repeatedly upgraded the confidence levels of the NTP’s scientists and staff had attached to the study (Cancer and mobile phones), fueling critics’ suspicions that the NTP’s leadership had tried to downplay the findings. Thus the peer review also found “some evidence” – one step below “clear evidence” – of cancer in the brain and adrenal glands.
This news was not only reported by one major news organisation in the US or Europe also news coverage of mobile phone safety has long reflected the outlook of the wireless industry. Now, the industry has been orchestrating a global PR campaign aimed at misleading not only journalists, but also consumers/customers and policymakers about the actual science concerning mobile phone radiation. Indeed, big wireless has borrowed the very same strategy and tactics big tobacco and big oil pioneered to deceive the public about the risks of smoking and climate change, respectively. And like their tobacco and oil counterparts, wireless industry CEOs lied to the public even after their own scientists privately warned that their products could be dangerous, especially to children.
George Carlo was main man for an industry whitewash. Tom Wheeler, the president of the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA), used Carlo to defuse a public relations crisis (threatened to strangle his infant industry in its crib). This was back in 1993, when there were only six mobile subscriptions for every 100 adults in the United States, but industry executives foresaw a booming future.
Remarkably, cell phones allowed to the US market a decade earlier without any state safety testing. Now, some customers and staff were being diagnosed with cancer. In January 1993, David Reynard sued the NEC America company, claiming that his wife’s NEC phone caused her lethal brain tumor. After Reynard claim, the story gained publicity. A congressional subcommittee announced an investigation; investigators began dumping mobile phone stocks and Wheeler and the CTIA swung into action.
Wheeler announced that his industry will pay for a comprehensive research programme after a week. Wheeler told reporters; the new research would simply “revalidate the findings of the existing studies”.
Carlo had conducted studies for other controversial industries. After a study funded by Dow Corning, Carlo had declared that breast implants posed only minimal health risks. With chemical industry funding, he had concluded that low levels of dioxin, the chemical behind the Agent Orange scandal, were not dangerous. In 1995, Carlo began directing the industry-financed Wireless Technology Research project (WTR), whose eventual budget of $28.5m made it the best-funded investigation of mobile safety to date.
Thanks for reading now let me recommend you some other practical guides about penetration testing of Remote Access Protocols, Remote Desktop Protocol, SSH Network Protocol, Network Routers, Wordpress website using WPSeku from My Hack Stuff.
Scientific Peer Review
This year a landmark United States government study concluded (scientific peer review) of that there is “clear evidence” that radiation from mobile phones causes cancer, they claimed more specifically that a heart tissue cancer (Cancer and mobile phones) in rats that is too rare to be explained as random occurrence.
3 days at Research Triangle Park, North Carolina spent by eleven volunteer scientists, discussing the study (Cancer and mobile phones), which was done by the National Toxicology Program of the US Department of Health and Human Services and ranks among the largest conducted of the health effects of mobile phone radiation. Those scientists showed that thousands of rats and mice having biological similarities to humans make them useful indicators of human health risks) to doses of radiation equivalent to an average mobile user’s lifetime exposure.
Peer review scientists repeatedly upgraded the confidence levels of the NTP’s scientists and staff had attached to the study (Cancer and mobile phones), fueling critics’ suspicions that the NTP’s leadership had tried to downplay the findings. Thus the peer review also found “some evidence” – one step below “clear evidence” – of cancer in the brain and adrenal glands.
This news was not only reported by one major news organisation in the US or Europe also news coverage of mobile phone safety has long reflected the outlook of the wireless industry. Now, the industry has been orchestrating a global PR campaign aimed at misleading not only journalists, but also consumers/customers and policymakers about the actual science concerning mobile phone radiation. Indeed, big wireless has borrowed the very same strategy and tactics big tobacco and big oil pioneered to deceive the public about the risks of smoking and climate change, respectively. And like their tobacco and oil counterparts, wireless industry CEOs lied to the public even after their own scientists privately warned that their products could be dangerous, especially to children.
Some known suspects from mobile phone radiations
George Carlo was main man for an industry whitewash. Tom Wheeler, the president of the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA), used Carlo to defuse a public relations crisis (threatened to strangle his infant industry in its crib). This was back in 1993, when there were only six mobile subscriptions for every 100 adults in the United States, but industry executives foresaw a booming future.
Remarkably, cell phones allowed to the US market a decade earlier without any state safety testing. Now, some customers and staff were being diagnosed with cancer. In January 1993, David Reynard sued the NEC America company, claiming that his wife’s NEC phone caused her lethal brain tumor. After Reynard claim, the story gained publicity. A congressional subcommittee announced an investigation; investigators began dumping mobile phone stocks and Wheeler and the CTIA swung into action.
Wheeler announced that his industry will pay for a comprehensive research programme after a week. Wheeler told reporters; the new research would simply “revalidate the findings of the existing studies”.
Carlo had conducted studies for other controversial industries. After a study funded by Dow Corning, Carlo had declared that breast implants posed only minimal health risks. With chemical industry funding, he had concluded that low levels of dioxin, the chemical behind the Agent Orange scandal, were not dangerous. In 1995, Carlo began directing the industry-financed Wireless Technology Research project (WTR), whose eventual budget of $28.5m made it the best-funded investigation of mobile safety to date.
Thanks for reading now let me recommend you some other practical guides about penetration testing of Remote Access Protocols, Remote Desktop Protocol, SSH Network Protocol, Network Routers, Wordpress website using WPSeku from My Hack Stuff.
COMMENTS